Fix type: end-to-end instead of end-by-end

[anna.git] / include / anna / diameter / codec / message.dtd

diff --git a/include/anna/diameter/codec/message.dtd b/include/anna/diameter/codec/message.dtd
index aea9779..50ad1c2 100755 (executable)
--- a/include/anna/diameter/codec/message.dtd
+++ b/include/anna/diameter/codec/message.dtd
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 <!ELEMENT message (avp*)>
 <!ELEMENT avp (avp*)>
 
-<!ATTLIST message version CDATA #IMPLIED name CDATA #IMPLIED code CDATA #IMPLIED flags CDATA #IMPLIED p-bit (yes | no) #IMPLIED e-bit (yes | no) #IMPLIED t-bit (yes | no) #IMPLIED application-id CDATA #REQUIRED hop-by-hop-id CDATA #IMPLIED end-by-end-id CDATA #IMPLIED>
+<!ATTLIST message version CDATA #IMPLIED name CDATA #IMPLIED code CDATA #IMPLIED flags CDATA #IMPLIED p-bit (yes | no) #IMPLIED e-bit (yes | no) #IMPLIED t-bit (yes | no) #IMPLIED application-id CDATA #REQUIRED hop-by-hop-id CDATA #IMPLIED end-to-end-id CDATA #IMPLIED>
 <!--
    version: Diameter version. Sets '1' by default
    name:    Command name within working stack (dictionary identifier)
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
 
    application-id:   Message application id
    hop-by-hop-id:    Message hop by hop id. Sets '0' by default
-   end-by-end-id:    Message end by end id. Sets '0' by default
+   end-to-end-id:    Message end to end id. Sets '0' by default
 -->
 
 <!ATTLIST avp name CDATA #IMPLIED code CDATA #IMPLIED vendor-code CDATA #IMPLIED flags CDATA #IMPLIED data CDATA #IMPLIED hex-data CDATA #IMPLIED alias CDATA #IMPLIED>
@@ -28,7 +28,10 @@
    name:   Avp name within working stack (dictionary identifier)
    
    In order to get more coding capabilities, avp code, vendor-id and flags could be established instead of former avp name,
-    but neither of them are allowed if 'name' is provided (and vice versa):
+    but neither of them are allowed if 'name' is provided (and vice versa), excepting 'flags' when 'may' or 'shouldnot' is
+    present in dictionary avp (actually bit P is deprecated by standard group, then, 'may' or 'shouldnot' won't be taken
+    into account for this bit: it someone uses it, our xml representation will differ from reality. At least with this
+    sacrifice in return, we will have nicer xml layouts in most of the cases):
    
    code:          Avp code
    vendor-code:   Avp vendor code