// most of the command codes as *[Failed-AVP], i think this is not a deliberate ambiguity.
// Probably the RFC wants to give freedom to the application layer, but it is recommended to
// have only one child (wrong avp) inside a unique message Failed-AVP to ease the Result-Code
// most of the command codes as *[Failed-AVP], i think this is not a deliberate ambiguity.
// Probably the RFC wants to give freedom to the application layer, but it is recommended to
// have only one child (wrong avp) inside a unique message Failed-AVP to ease the Result-Code